Five Big Ideas for Effective Teaching: Connecting Mind, Brain, and Education Research to Classroom Practice. Donna Wilson and Marcus Conyers. Teachers College Press, 2013.
Years ago while still teaching at a school in Los Angeles, a colleague of mine championed any professional development opportunities to make connections between neurological research and understanding how students learn. Many of the articles she encouraged me to read did, in fact, open my eyes to thinking more broadly about how my students might better acquire new knowledge.
Like my former colleague, authors Donna Wilson and Marcus Conyers clearly see connections between the brain and learning. This may seem like an obvious statement yet, as the authors successfully argue, there is a need to explain kinship between the brain, its functions, research, and teaching. In addition, such connections need to be presented to pre-service and professional teachers in convincing and clear presentations. In many ways, Wilson and Conyers succeed on this front. The big ideas are discussed in detail in separate chapters organized around questions intended to help focus readers and including sections that provide emphasis on a variety of key points. In addition, the text includes chapters on the challenges and opportunities of education in the 21st century, myth busting as an educator, and the forward nature of continuous learning. The five big ideas focus on the nature of neural plasticity (flexibility of the brain in terms of learning), recognizing human potential, understanding the nature of intelligence, how body movement can link to learning, and understanding concepts of metacognition.
A particularly important idea to embrace in successful teaching is to not have a fixed mindset about human potential or the nature of intelligence. Modeling a “growth” mindset is important to show students how everyone can continue learning, including teachers. Such modeling can be seen in teachers who demonstrate high standards, nurture students, focus on ideas like mastery, use formative assessment, and emphasize development of thinking skills among other ideas. This third “big idea” for teaching is an essential component of successful teaching. The teacher whose mindset remains fixed cannot bend or grow with their class. If the teacher won’t advance their own mind, why should the student?
A weaker aspect of the text are the “Perspectives on” dialogues that create conversations between fictional teachers in order to explain conflicting attitudes toward the big ideas (this is particularly true in the body-brain chapter). This method, while common in a number of texts about education, rings false. Perhaps reshaping these conversations as dialogue between real teachers presented with the concepts explained in the chapter might be more powerful. In addition, by using real people, the nature of debate and disagreement about teaching and learning could be viewed more clearly. I found the “from teachers to teachers” more helpful. These vignettes provide real case studies of how teachers are using some of the discussed strategies in practical, meaningful ways. I’m also not convinced by some defense of the Common Core standards that appear in the text (pp. 135, 143).
Overall however, the text provides some useful links and suggestions for how to improve teaching. To this end, I found the section covering the idea of metacognition, or, “thinking about thinking” particularly fascinating. When assigning complex tasks to students (eg, interpreting documents or writing an essay), metacognition demands that students consider how they go about these tasks and in what order (pp. 117-119). Each step becomes possible to complete, building toward the end goal and allows students to assess their progress along the way, seeing how and where they might improve. Such approaches allow teachers and students alike to see where structured support or perhaps research might aid learning. Finally, metacognition should work successfully in enhancing both student peer appraisal and teacher-directed suggestions and evaluation.